Capitol Notebook
Public opinion, and other problems with ObamaCare
Drew McKissick - March 9, 2010 - 11:41amThe biggest (political) problem with ObamaCare is that the public doesn't want it, as poll after poll after poll has demonstrated. The latest comes from Rasmussen, which shows (ominously for Obama) that the more Congress and the public focuses on the issue, the more opposed they become to it.
Currently, 53% of Americans are opposed to the pending Senate version of the bill, and only 42% support it. Keep in mind that these numbers come AFTER Congress spent over a year working on the issue, Obama made dozens of speeches and town hall appearances, and after the highly covered health care "summit" meeting with Congress that Obama sponsored. 55% think Congress should scrap the whole thing and start from scratch. read more »
- Drew McKissick's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Report this page
ObamaCare Arm-Twisting Going Into High Gear
Capitol Notebook - March 5, 2010 - 12:18pmNow that the Obama administration has decided to double-down on health care and demand passage of the Senate version of ObamaCare...and the White House has set a timeline of two weeks to get it done...it's safe to say that we're about to see some of the most severe arm twisting in political history.
In fact, if you thought it looked bad the first time around, (when the House version passed by only 3 votes, and the Senate version passed that chamber by the bare minimum), you haven't seen anything yet.
Why is that? Because the Democrats decided to forget about a conference committee, (the usual process of ironing out differences between House and Senate bills), and push the existing Senate bill through the House. The problem is that it must be passed WITHOUT any amendments or changes whatsoever. This is because, if it is changed, the Senate would have to approve it all over again...and this time there are 41 Republicans, (thanks to Scott Brown's win in Massachusetts), that can sustain a filibuster. read more »
Handy Dandy List of Swing Vote Representatives to Contact on ObamaCare
Capitol Notebook - March 3, 2010 - 4:12pmAs we move into what should be the final (and most important) phase of the debate over ObamaCare, it's of course critical that members of Congress hear from as many of their constituents as possible.
And given Obama's speech outlining how he wants Congress to move forward, and Nancy Pelosi's recent statements, it looks like they intent to move forward with using the trick of the Senate budget reconciliation rule to pass this monstrosity. This puts the near term focus on the House.
Below you'll find a list of the names and contact numbers for what appear to be the "swing votes" in the House on this issue. If one of them is YOUR Representative it is VITAL that you contact them now and let them know how you feel. If you would rather send them (or even all members of Congress) a fax, click here.
Contact them today... Then pass it on! read more »
- Capitol Notebook's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Report this page
Reconciliation: The Tyranny of Reid’s Majority
Waynes Discernment - March 3, 2010 - 4:08pmPeople who are pushing for Pelosicare, Reidcare or Obamacare will say reconciliation is a good and moral practice. They will site "Great" presidents who have used it. Or will they? Nobody printed on the US dollar has used it. Nobody who face is on a mountain has used it. No these people who are so honored warned against the tyranny of the majority and set in place protections against it - The 2/3rds rule. Reconciliation has been used to remove spending. It has been used to introduce changes to legislation. It has never been used to make massive changes in Government. Our greatest leaders never used it - Why would they? They were leaders not dictators.
2/3rds can be a difficult number. It is required to change the constitution or remove a president. Reconciliation was created to allow the congress to act quicker on small maters of state to prevent a filibuster. A filibuster requires 2/3rds to end it - It can be used at anytime but it is rarely used.
Our leaders have decided that 2/3rds may not be required to change 1/6th of our economy and impose a federal requirement that people must purchase insurance.
- Waynes Discernment's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Report this page
Texas Votes Overwhelmingly for Public Acknowledgements of God
Capitol Notebook - March 3, 2010 - 11:31amVoters in Texas made it unmistakably clear how they feel about their right to publicly acknowledge God in their primaries yesterday.
In the course of voting for (or against) nominees for public office, Texas Republicans were presented with a series of ballot questions. Among them, Question 4, stating:
The use of the word “God”, prayers, and the Ten Commandments should be
allowed at public gatherings and public educational institutions, as
well as be permitted on government buildings and property. YES OR NO
The result? 95% YES, 5% NO.
How's that for being clear about where the people in this country stand on questions of religious liberty? I think it's safe to say we have a consensus on this issue...despite what the folks who run radical left organizations like the ACLU and the Alliance for the Separation of Church and State may say.
- Capitol Notebook's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Report this page
ObamaCare: "The most pro-abortion legislation since Roe v. Wade"
Capitol Hill Update - March 3, 2010 - 9:37amAfter being thoroughly reprimanded by the American people in town meetings last summer, in Tea Party events, and most recently in elections in Virginia and the liberal states of Massachusetts and New Jersey, and after the president's charade "bipartisan" summit last week, the Democrat leaders, led by Barack Obama, are arrogantly determined to push through ObamaCare by Easter.
It is ironic that the Democrats have picked the Christian holiday of Easter as their deadline to ram through the most radical pro-abortion bill in American history, which will result in huge increases of abortions all across America, many paid for by American taxpayers.
Indeed, Douglas Johnson, the legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee in "LifeNews.com" said: "Every version of the health care bill has contained multiple pro-abortion mandates and federal subsidies for abortion -- except for the version that was fixed by adoption of the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, over Speaker Pelosi's objections.
"But President Obama and Senator Reid succeeded in keeping that fix out of the Senate bill -- indeed, the Senate produced a final bill that is the most pro-abortion single piece of legislation to reach the floor of either house of Congress since Roe v. Wade." read more »
- Capitol Hill Update's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Report this page
Obama to introduce ObamaCare 2.0 Wednesday
Capitol Notebook - March 2, 2010 - 3:16pmIt looks like the American public is going to have to endure (and oppose) at least one more version of ObamaCare before we can finally be done with it.
The White House announced that Obama would pitch the newest version of his "plan" tomorrow. Essentially, it looks like that plan will be "part" of the existing plans, with the addition of a few ideas that they call "Republican" ideas.
Of course this goes on against the backdrop of talk by the Democrat leadership (and the White House) that they will now look to use the budget reconciliation process to pass the bill. Which means they're going to attempt to get around a Republican filibuster by using a rule that was designed for the budget process...not legislation that can remake 1/6th of the US economy.
But you're not likely to hear Obama (and even few Democrats) use the word "reconciliation"...or any talk about using the special rule to pass his big program. Instead, they're rephrasing the talking points to use the term "simple majority". Of course, they're quick to overlook the fact that their proposal doesn't even come close to having a "simple majority" of support among the American people. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has taken the retooling of euphemisms to the next level, saying that "The bill can be bipartisan, even though the votes might not be bipartisan". read more »
Even a Center-Right Court Rules No on Ten Commandments
Capitol Hill Update - March 1, 2010 - 5:11pmToday, the United States Supreme Court refused to get involved in a lawsuit regarding a Ten Commandments display on public land in Oklahoma. This is a warning to conservatives and to other Americans who believe in religious freedom that elections have consequences.
The fact that a center-right U.S. Supreme Court can refuse to allow a Ten Commandments display on the grounds of a county courthouse in Stigler, Oklahoma is sobering. The additional fact that Barack Obama is quickly filling the federal court vacancies with legislate-from-the-bench left-wingers is truly terrifying.
An 8-foot-tall stone Ten Commandments monument has been on public property since the year 2004. Some atheists, egged on by the ACLU, challenged the monument through a lawsuit and a federal appeals court in 2009 ruled that the Ten Commandments monument was an unconstitutional endorsement of religion by the county commission.
Apparently, the United States Supreme Court is going to let the various circuit courts of appeal around the country make decisions on individual cases because in 2005, the nation's top court ruled in two cases that whether or not the Ten Commandments could be displayed on this government property or that government property would be determined on a case-by-case basis. read more »
- Capitol Hill Update's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Report this page
Latest ObamaCare poll: public still opposed
Capitol Notebook - March 1, 2010 - 1:49pmNow that last week's big health care "summit" has come and gone, it's a good time to take a look at what kind of impact it had on American public opinion about the Democrat's proposed reforms.
Short answer? Still opposed. The latest survey by Rasmussen shows 52% of voters opposed and 44% in favor. And remember, that's AFTER all the fluff coverage it received from the summit.
The more interesting numbers however, (and the ones that the politicians up for reelection this year should pay attention to), are those that demonstrate the passion and intensity people have about the issue. The survey shows 43% of voters being "strongly opposed", with only 22% "strongly in favor".
Not good for Democrats who have voted for it already, much less thinking about using the budget reconciliation process to get around a filibuster and pass it with a simple majority in Congress.
Some other interesting items: read more »
- Capitol Notebook's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Report this page
Obama Cranking Up the Re-Election Machine?
Capitol Notebook - February 24, 2010 - 4:48pmIt certainly looks like the folks in the White House are beginning to put Obama's re-election machinery into high gear. According to Politico, Obama's top hands are laying the groundwork for the 2012 campaign.
Of course, it's not unusual or even unexpected for a president to begin to make high profile preparations for a re-election campaign. It would be more surprising if he didn't. But what is surprising is how soon into his term that they've begun to make those moves. Usually this sort of thing doesn't happen until after the mid-term elections are over. But given how bad things look for Democrats lately, it doesn't look like they want to wait and take any chances.
And we're sure this story indicating that the younger demographic is beginning to slip away gives the president cause for concern. Especially when you consider that the greatest percentage of support for Barack Obama in his 2008 election came from young adults:
A year after supporting Barack Obama for president by an overwhelming 2-to-1 ratio, young adults are cooling quickly toward his Democrats amid dissatisfaction over the lack of change in Washington and an escalating war in Afghanistan. read more »
- Capitol Notebook's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Report this page
Get Connected!
Get our Daily Update via email:
Our Twitter feed
Recent Comments
- Thanks for the song, IChiara25
- v_tdelacy
- Waynes Discernment
- James Mabe
- markethealth911
- markethealth911
- Waynes Discernment
- Read what Jesus...
- Susan Bynum
- Chiara25
- Chiara25
- Dthomas
- Waynes Discernment
- buxtons



